|
Educating Children Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing:
Additional Learning Problems. ERIC Digest #E548.
ERIC Identifier: ED414666
Publication Date: 1997-08-00
Author: Pollack, B. J.
Source: ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education Reston
VA.
|
|
What is meant by "additional learning problems"
in the deaf or hard of hearing population?
Hearing loss has far-reaching, critical effects on childhood
development of cognitive (thinking) and linguistic (language) skills.
The occurrence of other disabilities in combination with diminished hearing
creates "additional learning problems" which significantly add
to the complexity of educating the student who is deaf or hard of hearing.
The prevalence of other disabilities in addition to hearing loss is approximately
three times as large (30.2%) in the deaf or hard of hearing population
as in the general school population. Some of this may be explained by
the varying causes of hearing loss. Some of the current documented etiologies
of childhood deafness include maternal rubella (2%), prematurity (5%),
cytomegalovirus (1%), and meningitis (9%) (Moores, 1987). It is logical
to assume that the population demonstrating a hearing loss is at a high
risk for additional disabilities since the previously mentioned etiologies
are also known to be associated with neurological involvements.
The prevalence of several specific disabilities occurring
with diminished hearing has been documented over time (Craig & Craig,
1993, 1983, 1973). The three additional disabilities most often reported
in children who are deaf or hard of hearing are learning disabilities,
intellectual disabilities, and emotional/behavioral disabilities. The
1993 reference issue of the American Annals of the Deaf reports learning
disabilities as the largest co-occurring disability at a prevalence of
9%. The prevalence of intellectual disabilities occurring with a hearing
loss followed closely at 8%. The co-occurrence of emotional/behavioral
disabilities was the least at a 4% occurrence rate.
Although there are difficulties in definitively characterizing
these frequently co-occurring disabilities, the following definitions
may apply. Students with co-occurring emotional/behavioral disabilities
are described as displaying inappropriate, disruptive, aggressive behaviors
that interfere with learning. Students with hearing loss and intellectual
disabilities are characterized by a generalized delay in development across
all areas of learning with limited problem-solving abilities and lowered
adaptive or functional skills. Students diagnosed with learning disabilities
and hearing loss are generally found to be in the average or above average
range of intelligence displaying skills and abilities in many different
ways while displaying specific learning deficits that restrict accomplishments.
They are described as exhibiting unusual learning characteristics considered
atypical of students who are deaf and hard of hearing in general; these
greatly affect their progress. These students are not progressing academically
in comparison to the documented parameters of delayed language and concept
learning found in the general population of students who are deaf or hard
of hearing (Bunch & Melnyk, 1989). In an effort to recognize this
subgroup's uniqueness, the field appears to be moving away from using
the label "learning-disabled hearing-impaired" and, instead,
is beginning to label these students "deaf or hard of hearing with
additional mild disabilities," "atypical learners with hearing
loss," and "deaf or hard of hearing learners with additional
learning problems."
How are additional learning problems identified in children
who are deaf or hard of hearing?
Identification of additional learning problems among
children with diminished hearing is a difficult and complex task. Part
of the difficulty arises from the fact that a hearing loss by itself creates
pervasive learning problems that usually result in very delayed language
acquisition and consequently delayed academic skills. Therefore, the identification
of any other interfering or additional influencing factors affecting the
students' learning can pose difficult issues. What difficulties come with
the hearing loss and what difficulties are caused by another source or
element? Furthermore, recognizing the additive effect of co-occurring
disabilities, what unique learning profile is created by the combination
of a hearing loss and the additional disability that are above and beyond
any profile characterizing each individual disability alone?
Sound assessment practices using interdisciplinary teams
are important when identifying additional disabilities in students who
are deaf or hard of hearing (Paplinger & Sikora, 1990). This is particularly
true when one considers that the characteristics displayed by students
with co-occurring disabilities are often the same. A consistent lack of
language learning, attention problems, retention difficulties, and delayed
academic skills are phrases that are heard when professionals in the field
describe students who have hearing losses and learning disabilities, intellectual
disabilities, or emotional/behavioral problems. Therefore, differential
diagnosis is critical to determining an accurate learning profile for
the individual student, which includes a clear determination of the disabilities
influencing that profile. The assessment should consist of teacher observations
and appropriate standardized assessment measures as well as informal assessment
procedures. Professionals involved should include school psychologists,
classroom teachers, occupational and physical therapists, speech/language
pathologists, audiologists, and any necessary medical personnel such as
nurses, psychiatrists, etc. The team should provide careful interpretation
of the assessment results with recommendations and suggestions for educational
programming.
What are some questions to ask in deciding whether or
not to refer my child/student for an evaluation?
Is the student who is deaf or hard of hearing progressing
as would be expected when compared to his/her hearing impaired peers?
This should be the first question when considering evaluation for a student
with a hearing loss. Researchers (Kretschmer & Kretschmer, 1989; McAnally
et al., 1994; and Yoshinaga-Itano, 1986) have documented parameters of
delayed language acquisition and academic progress commonly seen in learners
who are deaf or hard of hearing. Given the opportunities to learn language
and academic skills through appropriate and efficient modes of communication,
a learner with a hearing loss should progress in expected patterns of
growth and achievement. If this is not happening, questions should be
raised as to the reasons why.
Is the student with a hearing loss displaying any characteristics
that are not usually seen with a hearing loss?
Having a hearing loss brings with it many characteristics
that affect the learning of the student. However, the hearing loss alone
is not necessarily accompanied by such characteristics as visual-perceptual
problems, attention deficits, perceptual-motor difficulties, severe inability
to learn vocabulary and English structures, consistent retention and memory
problems or consistent distractive behaviors or emotional factors. If
any of these kinds of behaviors characterize the student who is deaf or
hard of hearing, then an investigation into the possible influencing factors
should be requested.
What are common strategies used to help these students?
It is very difficult to determine common strategies
for students with additional learning problems primarily because each
individual learning profile will be different depending on the number
and nature of the various influencing factors. After some time spent looking
for "fix-it" strategies, the professionals in this field appear
to be moving toward the belief that all students with hearing losses should
have individualized approaches to instruction, including those with additional
learning problems (Powers, 1993). It is indeed a challenge to the professionals
in the field to match the assessment learning profile with appropriate
educational strategies to address the delineated problems. Generally speaking
the following strategies may be useful. For those students with additional
learning problems that include severe lack of vocabulary and simple syntax
knowledge, work using pictures and picture symbols to support speech and/or
signs has proven beneficial (Chalk, 1996). For those hard of hearing students
who display characteristics more commonly associated with processing or
understanding of sound, learning disabled students have benefited from
many of the aural/oral remediation techniques used to improve listening
skills (Roth, 1991). Behavior techniques that include clearly defined
choices and expectations with natural consequences have proven effective.
Addressing emotional factors through the educational program and individual
or group counseling when appropriate have also proven beneficial (Gage,
et al, 1994; Rasing & Duker, 1993).
|
| References
Bunch, G. & Melnyk, T. (1989). A review of the evidence
for a learning-disabled, hearing impaired sub-group. American Annals of
the Deaf, 134, 297-300.
Chalk, P. (1996, Oct). New says of using communication
symbols. Paper presented at the Fall LEA Workshop, Cave Spring, GA.
Craig, W.N. & Craig, H.B. (Eds.).(1993). Tabular
summary of schools and classes in the U.S. American Annals of the Deaf,
138(2), 169-170.
Craig, W. N. & Craig, H.B. (Eds.). (1983). Tabular
summary of schools and classes in the U.S. American Annals of the Deaf,
127(2), 188-189.
Craig, W.N. & Craig, H.B. (Eds.). (1973). Tabular
summary of schools and classes in the U.S. American Annals of the Deaf,
118(2), 134-135.
Gage, S., Lou, M.W. & Charlson, E.S. (1994). A social
learning program for deaf adolescents. Perspectives for Teachers of the
Deaf, 13(2).
Kretschmer, R. & Kretschmer, L. (1989). Communication
competence: Impact of the pragmatics revolution on education of hearing
impaired children. Topics in Language Disorders, 9(4), 1-16.
McAnally, P.L., Rose, S. & Quigley, S.P. (1994).
Language learning practices with the deaf. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Moores, D.F. (1987). Educating the deaf: Psychology,
principles, practices. (3rd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Paplinger, D. & Sikora, D. (1990). Diagnosing a
learning disability in a hearing impaired child. American Annals of the
Deaf, 118, 480-487.
Powers, A.R. & Elliott, R.N. (Eds.). (1993). Deaf
and hard of hearing students with mild additional disabilities. Monograph.
Tuscaloosa, AL: The University of Alabama.
Rasing, E.J. & Duker, P.C. (1993). Acquisition and
generalization of social behaviors in language-disabled deaf children.
American Annals of the Deaf, 138(4), 362-369.
Roth, V. (1991). Students with learning disabilities
and hearing impairment: Issues for the secondary and post-secondary teacher.
Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24(7), 391-397.
Yoshinaga-Itano, C. & Downey, D. (1986). A hearing-impaired
child's acquisition of schemata: Something is missing. Topics in Language
Disorders, 7(1), 45-57.
For more information about the assessment process, see
ERIC Digest E550 (Ed414668), on assessment of students who are deaf and
hard of hearing. For more information about services available in your
state, contact your state's school for the deaf. A listing of these may
be found annually in the April edition of the American Annals of the Deaf
periodical.
Dr. Pollack is the educational diagnostician on
the Diagnostic and Evaluation Team, Atlanta Area School for the Deaf.
|
|